Why Greece May Still be Headed Out of Eurozone

When Greek leaders began a shift in policy last year to ease themselves out from under the tutelage of foreign creditors, they hoped it would bring economic as well as political gains.

Nine months on, falling output and a slump in asset values have racked up costs to the economy that by one measure stand at over 60 billion euros, or a third of national income, while EU states and the IMF may have to lend Athens three times more than they had planned to bail out Greece for a third time.

With difficult negotiations about to start and capital controls still in force, further missteps and uncertainty mean the bill is likely to rise even further throughout the summer.

"The Greek negotiating stance was not a huge success," said Christoph Weil, European economist at Commerzbank. "It is clear that the Greek economy is in a strong recession. In the first two quarters of this year it is clearly a result of Greek government policies."

In the second half of 2014, centre-right Prime Minister Antonis Samaras, hoping to be re-elected, began exploring how to get out of the tight supervision of the EU, ECB and IMF creditors known as the "troika", an institution hated by many Greeks.

Growth was picking up and Athens had managed to raise funds in the market. Samaras hoped to end the euro zone bailout in February and quit the IMF programme by arranging a new, one-year back-up facility of 20-30 billion euros with the euro zone.

Today, after Samaras's gamble on early elections saw leftist Alexis Tsipras take power in January with a mandate to end austerity, output is shrinking fast and creditors expect Greece, which defaulted last month on the IMF, to be shut out of credit markets for up to three years and need 80-100 billion euros.

Adding together unrealised potential GDP, lost asset value on listed equities and the shrinking capital base of Greek banks, produces a figure of 63 billion euros, based on forecasts and data published by the creditors and others.

DOUBTS GREECE CAN REMAIN IN EURO

That number, calculated by Reuters, does not reflect the loss of value by other Greek assets or less tangible or future damage due, for example, to lost trust among investors and lenders and to increased doubts that Greece can remain in the euro zone.

"The fact that Grexit was so clearly an option in the debate will continue to make foreign investment complicated," said Mark Wall, chief euro zone economist at Deutsche Bank in London.

This week, the IMF and European Commission published analyses of Greece's financial position pointing to a rapid deterioration since the end of 2014 and especially this month, when Athens imposed capital controls to prevent a bank run after it rejected a loans-for-reforms deal.

"The figures show that the huge downturn has purely political reasons -- insecurity," one EU official said, adding that growth elsewhere in Europe should have boosted the economy.

In the bureaucratic language of the Commission report: "There are substantial financial stability risks in Greece which are caused by the uncertainty on the economic and financial policies of the Greek authorities over the last half year."

The Commission in early November expected the Greek economy to expand by 2.9 per cent this year, up from 1 percent growth in 2014. In 2016, growth was seen accelerating to 3.7 per cent.

Creditors now expect GDP to contract by up to 4 percent this year, even assuming the smooth implementation of a new bailout.

That difference in growth translates into 12.6 billion euros in 2015, economists estimate. Another 9.8 billion euros will be lost in expected growth differences in 2016.

MOST EXPENSIVE FINANCE MINISTER IN HISTORY

"Varoufakis was the most expensive finance minister in history," one senior EU official said, reflecting the bitterness many feel towards the Marxist economist Tsipras fired last week.

Athens stock market capitalisation was 64 billion euros in December when Samaras called the election he went on to lose.

By June 25, just before capital controls were imposed, the stock exchange had lost a quarter of its value.

Greek banks have suffered. Last year, they attracted 8 billion euros in private capital and issued unsecured bonds. Now creditors estimate the sector may need 25 billion in additional capital. The banks only survive thanks to 89 billion euros of ECB emergency liquidity assistance (ELA).

The number of non-performing loans in Greece rose to 36 percent at the end of the first quarter and 8 percent is classified as restructured against 31 percent at the end of September.

Greece sold 5-year bonds at a yield of 4.95 percent in April 2014 with 93 percent of the demand from international investors. But it was cut off from viable market borrowing again this year and the yield on that bond maturing in 2019 bond is now 19.7 percent.

"Greece's public debt has become highly unsustainable," the IMF said in its analysis. "This is due to the easing of policies during the last year, with the recent deterioration in the domestic macroeconomic and financial environment," it said.

"If you add up all the aid that the euro zone has given Greece, it is some half a trillion euros, transferred to an economy of 180 billion (euros annual GDP). That is an enormous transfer of wealth," the senior EU official said, echoing the frustration among creditor governments, many of them poorer than Greece.

The experience of negotiating with ministers in Athens has also soured many, fuelling arguments that it may be cheaper for Europe to push Greece out of the euro now.

The biggest factor in that argument is the uncertainty that Greece's status creates across the continent, as well as the potential for one day having to write off much of its debt.

There are other costs, too. There have been 10 meetings of the 19 euro zone finance ministers in the past month, each preceded by meetings of officials, and three summits of the 19 euro zone leaders, just to deal with Greece.

"Imagine if you value a minister's time at 1,000 euros per hour, which is a low number, and the heads of government time at 2,000 euros per hour," one official said. "And you have hundreds of people spending hundreds of hours across the euro zone."


© Thomson Reuters 2015

Sultan of Brunei Bids for Sahara's New York and London Luxury Hotels: Report

New York: The Sultan of Brunei has made a bid for New York's Plaza Hotel, Dream Hotel and London's Grosvenor House hotel, the Wall Street Journal's website edition reported on Saturday, citing people familiar with the situation.
An investment firm affiliated with Brunei has offered to pay $2 billion for the three hotels, which are currently owned by the Sahara conglomerate, WSJ.com said.
Sahara's chairman Subrata Roy has been negotiating a sale of the company's luxury hotels from a makeshift office in prison, having been held for more than five months after failing to appear at a contempt hearing in a long-running dispute over his group's failure to repay billions of dollars to investors who were sold outlawed bonds.
Roy's lawyer S. Ganesh last week told India's Supreme Court that the businessman was holding "very effective" negotiations with potential buyers and that the group had signed a preliminary accord for the hotels.
Brunei officials have reportedly been in discussions throughout the summer with representatives of Sahara, WSJ.com said, citing its sources, adding that an agreement could be reached as early as next month.
The Sultan, along with his luxury hotel operator, the Dorchester Collection, has been criticised for harsh new laws in Brunei.
The laws, which include death by stoning for homosexuals and adulterers, have fueled public calls in the United States for the company to sell its properties. They have resulted in boycotts of the Beverly Hills Hotel and other Dorchester properties in Europe, costing the luxury hotel operator millions of dollars in lost revenue, Dorchester has said.
Copyright: Thomson Reuters 2014

Deutsche Bank Expects FM to Present 'Path-Breaking' Budget

Deutsche Bank expects the following 12 big policy measures in the budget,
(1) Rationalize subsidies in a politically prudent manner through moderate monthly price hikes, stretching beyond diesel to LPG and even kerosene (Key beneficiaries: HPCL, BPCL ONGC, Oil India)
(2) Re-direct government expenditure from revenue to capital expenditure and use welfare programmes for capacity creating outlays. Enhance resource allocation to infrastructure. (L&T, UltraTech, ABB, Siemens)
(3) A reorientation of the MGNREGA scheme towards focused capacity creating measures like rural roadways and irrigation projects (UltraTech)
(4) Announcement of new flagship mega-infrastructure projects with time bound deadlines - Delhi Mumbai industrial corridor, Diamond quadrilateral for railways, broadband highways, smart cities. (L&T, ABB, Siemens)
(5) Usher in a new regime of FDI Liberalization with special focus on raising FDI limits in Defense, railways and insurance to 51 per cent or higher (Siemens, L&T, Bharat Forge, Max India, Reliance Capital)
(6) The highest ever target for disinvestments of government's equity stakes in PSU companies. Announced target in range of Rs.60,000- Rs. 80,000 crore.
(7) Create enabling environment for higher flows into equity capital markets, by raising investment limits of pension funds and the LIC in equity capital markets. (Kotak Mahindra Bank, HDFC Bank, Reliance Capital)
(8) Address the urgent need to recapitalize PSU banks either via diluting government stakes to 51 per cent or through establishing holding company entity for government stakes in PSU banks. (Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda)
(9) With limited room to raise taxes , and yet address fiscal imbalances, government to rely on raising revenue through auction of resources like coal and telecom spectrum, which can be fairly significant.
(10) Provide tax relief to the middle class through raising basic exemption limit to Rs. 3 lakh - Rs. 4 lakh and hiking deduction under Sec 80C to Rs. 2 lakh. The revenue thus foregone may be compensated by raising tax on the super-rich.
(11) Articulate a credible roadmap with time-bound deadlines on ushering the Goods and Services Tax (GST) by March 2016.
(12) Address foreign investor concerns on retrospective taxation by making India's tax environment transparent, less adversarial and prospective only.

Source: NDTV Profit

PM Modi Eyes First Labour Overhaul in Decades to Create Jobs

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has set in motion the first major revamp in decades of the archaic labour laws, part of a plan to revive the flagging economy, boost manufacturing and create millions of jobs.
Successive governments have agreed labour reform is critical to absorb 200 million Indians reaching working age over the next two decades, but fears of an ugly union-led backlash and partisan politics have prevented changes to free up labour markets.
Now, with the benefit of a single party majority in Lok Sabha for the first time in 30 years, laws that date back to just after the end of British rule are set for an overhaul. Officials at the labour ministry say this is a top priority in the government's first 100 days in office.
India has a forest of labour laws, including anachronisms such as providing spittoons in the work place, and are so complex that most firms choose to stay small. In 2009, 84 per cent of India's manufacturers employed fewer than 50 workers, compared to 25 per cent in China, according to a study this year by consultancy firm McKinsey & Co.
The World Bank said in a 2014 report that India has one of the most rigid labour markets in the world and "although the regulations are meant to enhance the welfare of workers, they often have the opposite effect by encouraging firms to stay small and thus circumvent labour laws".
Business leaders hope Modi, who advocates smaller government and private enterprise, will be a liberaliser in the mould of Margaret Thatcher or Ronald Reagan. Perhaps the most important change, they say, is to rules making it hard to dismiss workers.
First up, though, to win public support, his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government is looking to make changes that benefit workers, three senior officials at the labour ministry said. Among the changes: making more workers eligible for minimum wages, increasing overtime hours and allowing women to do night shifts.
"We are trying to provide a hassle free environment that helps both workers and industry," a senior labour ministry official involved in the deliberations said. "It is a priority for us."
Next on the reform agenda will be the most sensitive issue of loosening strict hire and fire rules. Officials said they have begun preliminary talks with concerned groups about slowly implementing the changes.
"There is a definite push ... you will see more measures," said another official at the ministry who is privy to the discussions within the government.
Reforms Key to Manufacturing Jobs
India's 20-year streak of fast economic expansion is often derided as "jobless growth" since the service sector-led model has been capital rather than labour-intensive.
India does not produce reliable, regular jobless data, but long-term surveys by the statistics department show the country only created 5 million manufacturing jobs between 2004/5 and 2011/12. In the same period some 33 million people left farms looking for better paid work. The majority were absorbed into low productivity and irregular work on construction sites.
Moreover, research suggests India needs 12 million new jobs every year to absorb the largest youth bulge the world has ever seen. It has fallen far behind that target.
Companies complain that current laws requiring rarely granted government permission for layoffs make it impossible to respond to business downturns, and blame the laws for the country's relatively small manufacturing sector.
Manufacturing contributes just 15 per cent to India's nearly $2 trillion economy. New Delhi says it wants to lift that share to 25 per cent within a decade to help create 100 million jobs. Comparatively, manufacturing accounted for 45 per cent of China's GDP in 2012.
"If business cycles are volatile, the ability to downsize and upsize should be freely available," said R. Shankar Raman, chief financial officer at Larsen & Toubro, one of India's biggest conglomerates.
In what is seen as a test for Modi's labour reform agenda and is intended to inspire other states, Rajasthan this month proposed amendments to the central law to allow firms in the state to lay off up to 300 workers without government permission. Currently, clearance is required to fire more than 100 workers and this is rarely granted.
Labour Militancy Declines
Labour unions cutting across party affiliations have opposed thestate government's move and have asked Modi to intervene. The BJP's own union has called a meeting of its officials early next month to chalk out a strategy to protest what it said was a lack of consultation over the shakeup in Rajasthan.
Since almost all the unions in India have political affiliations, their opposition to reforms has a risk of turning into a full-scale political agitation. But the risk that the reforms could also bring full-blown street protests similar to that seen in Thatcher's Britain are unlikely.
Labour militancy has declined in India, although sporadic violent protests like one at a Maruti Suzuki factory in 2012 which resulted in a death of a company official are enough to make policymakers wary on the pace of reform.
The labour ministry has asked for public comments by early July on the changes it plans to the Minimum Wages Act, which sets minimum wages for skilled and unskilled labours, and the Factory Act, which governs health and safety.
The proposed changes would standardize minimum wages nationally while increasing the frequency of salary revisions based on consumer prices. Although potentially inflationary, the move could bring millions of workers into the formal economy.
The ministry also wants to extend the amount of overtime workers can clock and scrap a 1948 rule that prohibits women working at night in factories, suggestions that have been welcomed by both labour groups and employers.

Copyright: Thomson Reuters 2014

LPG Cylinder Prices May Go Up By Rs. 5 Every Month: Report

After diesel, the government is considering raising cooking gas (LPG) and kerosene rates in small doses of Rs. 5 per cylinder and Rs.0.50-1 a litre every  month to wipe out Rs. 80,000 crore subsidy on the two fuels.
     
The previous UPA government had in January 2013 decided to raise diesel prices by up to 50 paise litre every month.
     
But for aberrations on two occasions, the monthly increases have taken place regularly to trim subsidy on diesel to just Rs. 1.62 a litre. This too looks set to be wiped off to make the fuel deregulated or free, with the new government continuing with the UPA decision.
     
Following the diesel model, the oil ministry is now proposing monthly increases in LPG and kerosene rates, sources privy to the development said.
     
Subsidy on LPG currently is a staggering Rs. 432.71 per 14.2-kg cylinder and at Rs. 5 per month increase it will take 7 years to wipe out the subsidy.
     
Sources said the ministry is of the view that the monthly increases can be as high as Rs. 10 if the political leadership takes a stand.
     
On kerosene, the subsidy currently is Rs. 32.87 per litre and at Re 1 hike per month it would take more than two-and-a- half years to wipe out the subsidy.
     
Fuel subsidy, they said, is the biggest drain on the exchequer. In the current fiscal, subsidy on diesel, LPG and kerosene is estimated atRs. 115,548 crore. Of this, LPG accounts for Rs. 50,324 crore and kerosene Rs. 29,488 crore.
     
This subsidy is met through a combination of direct cash dole from the budget and contribution by state-owned firms like ONGC.
     
In 2013-14, the government paid Rs. 70,772 crore in cash subsidy while upstream firms shelled out Rs. 67,021 crore. In the previous year, the government payout was Rs. 100,000 crore and upstream contribution Rs. 60,000 crore.
     
For diesel, the subsidy estimated is Rs. 35,736 crore but this will come down if the monthly increases continue as planned, sources said.
     
Petrol price was deregulated in June 2010 and retail rates have more or less moved in tandem with the cost.
     
With the introduction of monthly increases in January, subsidy on diesel tripped to less than Rs. 3 a litre in May last year before a fall in rupee value led to it widening to Rs. 14.50 per litre in September, 2013


Source: NDTV Profit

Market Weekahead: High expectations as Modi becomes PM


Shares may look to extend gains in the first half of next week as Narendra Modi is set to be sworn in as the country's prime minister on Monday. The first task for Modi will be to pick a new cabinet, with the finance ministry expected to go to former commerce minister Arun Jaitley. Comments on the fiscal deficit, inflation, and the relationship with central bank Governor Raghuram Rajan will be of prime importance to investors. That could help sustain gains for the BSE Sensex, which on Friday became the best performing equity index in Asia-Pacific for 2014. However, the second half of the week could be volatile given the expiry of May derivatives contracts, and a slew of key earnings such as Tata Motors Ltd , Sun Pharmaceutical Industries   and  Coal India  .

Source: Moneycontrol.com


Rupee Hits 10-Month High of 59.51 Per Dollar on Exit Poll Hopes

Rupee rallied to its strongest level against the dollar since July 2013 on widespread hopes that exit polls later on Monday would show the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party winning a majority in the country's elections.
The optimism comes even as exit polls in previous elections have proved to be unreliable.
India's five-week long elections are set to conclude on Monday, with exit polls from media organisations to be released starting after 6:30 p.m. Actual results will be out on Friday.
The partially convertible rupee touched as much 59.51 per dollar on Monday, the strongest level since July 29, 2013, compared to its 60.02/03 close on Friday.
Copyright: Thomson Reuters 2014